Salsa Dip Mild vs Salsa Roja
Overall, Salsa Dip Mild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salsa Dip Mild | Salsa Roja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 8.7 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa Dip Mild has 15% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Salsa Dip Mild has 53% less sugar (4.1 g vs 8.7 g).
- Salsa Roja has 32% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Salsa Dip Mild has 43% more fiber (2.8 g vs 1.6 g).
- Salsa Dip Mild has 33% more protein (1.5 g vs 1 g).
- Salsa Roja is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Salsa Roja lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Salsa Dip Mild
Tomates en morceaux 53%, eau, oignons 10%, concentré de tomates 10%, poivrons vert 7%, sel, vinaigre, copeaux d'oignons, épices, oignons en poudre, piment chilli 0.5%, sucre, jus de citron concentré, épaississant: gomme xanthane E415, ail en poudre, correcteur d'acidité E330, affermissant: chlorure de calcium E509, origan, extrait de paprika.
Salsa Roja
Purée de tomates, purée d'oignons, sucre, vinaigre, jus de citron vert, jus de citron jaune, sel, mélange d'épices (dont piment chipotle).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salsa Dip Mild or Salsa Roja?
Overall, Salsa Dip Mild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa Dip Mild has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salsa Dip Mild has less sugar: 4.1 g versus 8.7 g per 100 g.