Salat s kurecim masem vs Rybí salát pikant
Overall, Salat s kurecim masem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salat s kurecim masem | Rybí salát pikant |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 161 kcal |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | — |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salat s kurecim masem has 49% fewer calories (82 kcal vs 161 kcal).
- Rybí salát pikant has 12% less fat (5 g vs 5.7 g).
- Salat s kurecim masem has 40% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Salat s kurecim masem has 85% less sugar (3.2 g vs 21 g).
- Salat s kurecim masem has 79% less salt (0.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Rybí salát pikant has 42% more protein (6 g vs 3.5 g).
- Salat s kurecim masem has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Rybí salát pikant lists: Eggs, Fish.
Ingredients
Salat s kurecim masem
Not available.
Rybí salát pikant
Sleď 35 % (sleď obecný-Clupea harengus, ocet kvasný lihový, jedlá sůl, sladidlo (sukralosa), koření), pitná voda, cukr, okurky, paprika, cibule, chilli papričky 4,4%, ocet kvasný lihový, rajčatový protlak, česnek, jedlá sůl, modifikovaný škrob, konzervant (benzoan sodný). Může obsahovat celer, mléko, hořčici a vejce..
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salat s kurecim masem or Rybí salát pikant?
Overall, Salat s kurecim masem has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salat s kurecim masem has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salat s kurecim masem has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 21 g per 100 g.