Saké pour cuisine vs Sen
Overall, Sen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saké pour cuisine | Sen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 4 kcal | 87 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saké pour cuisine has 95% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 87 kcal).
- Sen has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.4 g).
- Sen has 83% more protein (1.8 g vs 0.3 g).
Ingredients
Saké pour cuisine
Eau, assaisonnements fermentés (riz, koji de riz, sel), alcool, sel, sirop à haute teneur en maltose (amidon de maïs, fécule de patate douce, fécule de pomme de terre), correcteur d'acidité (E330).
Sen
Eau, riz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saké pour cuisine or Sen?
Overall, Sen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saké pour cuisine has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 87 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saké pour cuisine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.