Mirin Saké doux pour cuisiner vs Sen
Overall, Sen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mirin Saké doux pour cuisine... | Sen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 146 kcal | 87 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 28 g | 0 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sen has 40% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 146 kcal).
- Sen has 100% less sugar (0 g vs 28 g).
- Sen has 60% more protein (1.8 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Mirin Saké doux pour cuisiner
Vin de riz* 62,5 % (eau, riz, koji, alcool), eau, sucre de canne*.
Sen
Eau, riz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mirin Saké doux pour cuisiner or Sen?
Overall, Sen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sen has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 146 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sen has less sugar: 0 g versus 28 g per 100 g.