SAINT ELOI riz complet cuisson 10 mn étui 500gr vs Classic Wholegrain Rice
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
SAINT ELOI riz complet cuisson 10 mn étui 500gr
Classic Wholegrain Rice
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | SAINT ELOI riz complet cuiss... | Classic Wholegrain Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 6.4 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 4.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Classic Wholegrain Rice has 52% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 357 kcal).
- Classic Wholegrain Rice has 20% less fat (2.1 g vs 2.6 g).
- SAINT ELOI riz complet cuisson 10 mn étui 500gr has 55% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Classic Wholegrain Rice has 61% more fiber (6.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- SAINT ELOI riz complet cuisson 10 mn étui 500gr has 47% more protein (7.7 g vs 4.1 g).
- SAINT ELOI riz complet cuisson 10 mn étui 500gr is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only SAINT ELOI riz complet cuisson 10 mn étui 500gr lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
SAINT ELOI riz complet cuisson 10 mn étui 500gr
Riz Long Grain Complet Étuvé De Qualité Supérieure
Classic Wholegrain Rice
COOKED WHOLEGRAIN RICE (99%) (Water, Wholegrain Rice), Sunflower Oil.
FAQ
Which is healthier: SAINT ELOI riz complet cuisson 10 mn étui 500gr or Classic Wholegrain Rice?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Classic Wholegrain Rice has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
SAINT ELOI riz complet cuisson 10 mn étui 500gr has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.