Ruffles Raspberry Coconut vs London Dry Gin
Overall, London Dry Gin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ruffles Raspberry Coconut | London Dry Gin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 460 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 19.3 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 61.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- London Dry Gin has no calories, while Ruffles Raspberry Coconut has 460 kcal.
- London Dry Gin has no fat, while Ruffles Raspberry Coconut has 19.3 g.
- London Dry Gin has no saturated fat, while Ruffles Raspberry Coconut has 15.4 g.
- London Dry Gin has no sugar, while Ruffles Raspberry Coconut has 61.8 g.
- Ruffles Raspberry Coconut has 100% more fiber (3.6 g vs 0 g).
- Ruffles Raspberry Coconut has 100% more protein (2.6 g vs 0 g).
- London Dry Gin is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Ruffles Raspberry Coconut
Sugar, Dark Chocolate 20%, Desiccated Coconut 19%, glucose syrup, colour, flavouring, invertase, acid
London Dry Gin
Ginebra.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ruffles Raspberry Coconut or London Dry Gin?
Overall, London Dry Gin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
London Dry Gin has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 460 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
London Dry Gin has less sugar: 0 g versus 61.8 g per 100 g.