Rösti classic vs Rosti
Overall, Rösti classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rösti classic | Rosti |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 188 kcal |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | — |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rösti classic has 49% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 188 kcal).
- Rösti classic has 55% less fat (3.6 g vs 8 g).
- Rösti classic has 67% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Rösti classic has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rosti has 57% more fiber (3 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Rösti classic
Pomme de terre 95%, huile de colza, sel, épices, maltodextrine, amidon de pomme de terre, acide ascorbique, acide citrique, jus de citron concentré.
Rosti
Pomme de terre 88% Huile de tournesol 8% Pomme de terre déshydratée Sel Oignon en poudre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rösti classic or Rosti?
Overall, Rösti classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rösti classic has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 188 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rösti classic has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.