Roses des sables vs Rose des Sables
Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roses des sables | Rose des Sables |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 469 kcal | 481 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 28 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 6.9 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rose des Sables has 65% less salt (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Roses des sables has 56% more fiber (6.9 g vs 3 g).
- Roses des sables has 12% more protein (6.8 g vs 6 g).
- Only Rose des Sables lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Roses des sables
Not available.
Rose des Sables
Maïs, sucre, pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, sel, extrait de malt d'orge, émulsifiant (lécithines (soja)), arôme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roses des sables or Rose des Sables?
Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roses des sables has fewer calories: 469 kcal versus 481 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roses des sables has less sugar: 28 g versus 28 g per 100 g.