Roses des Sables vs Roses des sables
Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roses des Sables | Roses des sables |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 506 kcal | 469 kcal |
| Fat | 24.7 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.4 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 46 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 6.9 g |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roses des sables has 19% less fat (20 g vs 24.7 g).
- Roses des sables has 17% less saturated fat (12 g vs 14.4 g).
- Roses des sables has 39% less sugar (28 g vs 46 g).
- Roses des Sables has 40% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Only Roses des Sables lists: Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Roses des Sables
72% couverture de chocolat au lait : sucre, beurre de cacao, _lait_ entier en poudre, pâte de cacao, _lactosérum_, matière grasse de _lait_ anhydre, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), arôme de vanilline; 22% flocons de maïs : farine de maïs, sucre, set et extrait de malt d'_orge_, émulsifiant (E471); 3% _amandes_; 3% Huile de tournesol. CACAO 30% MINIMUM
Roses des sables
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roses des Sables or Roses des sables?
Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roses des sables has fewer calories: 469 kcal versus 506 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roses des sables has less sugar: 28 g versus 46 g per 100 g.