Comparison

Mini roses des sables au chocolat au lait vs Roses des sables

Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMini roses des sables au cho...Roses des sables
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 504 kcal 469 kcal
Fat 26.1 g 20 g
Saturated fat 16.3 g 12 g
Sugars 45.5 g 28 g
Salt 0.7 g 1 g
Fiber — 6.9 g
Protein 6.9 g 6.8 g
Additives20
AllergensMilk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Roses des sables has 23% less fat (20 g vs 26.1 g).
  • Roses des sables has 26% less saturated fat (12 g vs 16.3 g).
  • Roses des sables has 38% less sugar (28 g vs 45.5 g).
  • Mini roses des sables au chocolat au lait has 30% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Only Mini roses des sables au chocolat au lait lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Mini roses des sables au chocolat au lait

Sucre-pétales de maïs 19% (farine de mais-sucre-sel-extrait de malt d'orge-émulsifiant: lécithine de soja)-beurre de cacao - lait entier en poudre - pâte de cacao - lactose-lactosérum en poudre - lait écrémé en poudre - émulsifiant: lécithine de soja - sel-arome.Cacao: 30% minimum dans le chocolat au lait. Traces de noisettes, autres fruits à coque, arachides.

Roses des sables

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mini roses des sables au chocolat au lait or Roses des sables?

Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Roses des sables has fewer calories: 469 kcal versus 504 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roses des sables has less sugar: 28 g versus 45.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons