Mini roses des Sables vs Roses des sables
Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mini roses des Sables | Roses des sables |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 502 kcal | 469 kcal |
| Fat | 25.9 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 16.3 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 45.5 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 6.9 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roses des sables has 23% less fat (20 g vs 25.9 g).
- Roses des sables has 26% less saturated fat (12 g vs 16.3 g).
- Roses des sables has 38% less sugar (28 g vs 45.5 g).
- Roses des sables has 84% more fiber (6.9 g vs 1.1 g).
- Only Mini roses des Sables lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Mini roses des Sables
Sucre, pétales de maïs 19% (farine de maïs, sucre, sel, extrait de malt d'_orge_, émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_), beurre de cacao, _lait_ entier en poudre, pâte de cacao, _lactose_, _lactosérum_ en poudre, _lait_ écrémé en poudre, émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_, sel, arôme.
Roses des sables
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mini roses des Sables or Roses des sables?
Overall, Roses des sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roses des sables has fewer calories: 469 kcal versus 502 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roses des sables has less sugar: 28 g versus 45.5 g per 100 g.