Romans de Romans vs Père Michel
Overall, Romans de Romans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Romans de Romans | Père Michel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 224 kcal | 379 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Romans de Romans has 41% fewer calories (224 kcal vs 379 kcal).
- Romans de Romans has 32% less fat (23 g vs 34 g).
- Romans de Romans has 32% less saturated fat (15 g vs 22 g).
- Père Michel has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Romans de Romans has 23% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Père Michel has 41% more protein (17 g vs 10 g).
- Romans de Romans is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Romans de Romans
_lait_ de vache thermisé, sel, ferments lactiques (_lait_), présure animale.
Père Michel
Pasteurisierte Milch, Speisesalz, mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff, Käsereikulturen (enthalten Milch), Farbstoff: Paprikaextrakt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Romans de Romans or Père Michel?
Overall, Romans de Romans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Romans de Romans has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 379 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Père Michel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.