Camembert juusto vs Romans de Romans
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Camembert juusto | Romans de Romans |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 278 kcal | 224 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.6 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Romans de Romans has 19% fewer calories (224 kcal vs 278 kcal).
- Camembert juusto has no sugar, while Romans de Romans has 2.5 g.
- Romans de Romans has 38% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Camembert juusto has 50% more protein (20 g vs 10 g).
Ingredients
Camembert juusto
Termisoitu maito (alkuperä: Ranska), suola, hapatteet, juoksete.
Romans de Romans
_lait_ de vache thermisé, sel, ferments lactiques (_lait_), présure animale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Camembert juusto or Romans de Romans?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Romans de Romans has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 278 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Camembert juusto has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.