Comparison

Romans de Romans vs Gran Castelli Juusto

Overall, Romans de Romans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRomans de RomansGran Castelli Juusto
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 224 kcal 385 kcal
Fat 23 g 29 g
Saturated fat 15 g 19.6 g
Sugars 2.5 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 1.5 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 10 g 31 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Romans de Romans has 42% fewer calories (224 kcal vs 385 kcal).
  • Romans de Romans has 21% less fat (23 g vs 29 g).
  • Romans de Romans has 23% less saturated fat (15 g vs 19.6 g).
  • Gran Castelli Juusto has no sugar, while Romans de Romans has 2.5 g.
  • Romans de Romans has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Gran Castelli Juusto has 68% more protein (31 g vs 10 g).

Ingredients

Romans de Romans

_lait_ de vache thermisé, sel, ferments lactiques (_lait_), présure animale.

Gran Castelli Juusto

_Lait_ thermisé de vache, sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Romans de Romans or Gran Castelli Juusto?

Overall, Romans de Romans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Romans de Romans has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gran Castelli Juusto has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons