Comparison

Romans de Romans vs LA Raclette SANS CROÛTE classique

Overall, Romans de Romans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRomans de RomansLA Raclette SANS CROÛTE clas...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 224 kcal 360 kcal
Fat 23 g 28 g
Saturated fat 15 g 18 g
Sugars 2.5 g 1 g
Salt 1 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 10 g 26 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Romans de Romans has 38% fewer calories (224 kcal vs 360 kcal).
  • Romans de Romans has 18% less fat (23 g vs 28 g).
  • Romans de Romans has 17% less saturated fat (15 g vs 18 g).
  • LA Raclette SANS CROÛTE classique has 60% less sugar (1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Romans de Romans has 38% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • LA Raclette SANS CROÛTE classique has 62% more protein (26 g vs 10 g).
  • Romans de Romans is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Romans de Romans

_lait_ de vache thermisé, sel, ferments lactiques (_lait_), présure animale.

LA Raclette SANS CROÛTE classique

_Lait_ de vache (origine France) écrémé pasteurisé, protéines de _lait_, matière grasse de _lait_, sel, ferments _lactiques_ et d'affinage, coagulant microbien.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Romans de Romans or LA Raclette SANS CROÛTE classique?

Overall, Romans de Romans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Romans de Romans has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

LA Raclette SANS CROÛTE classique has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons