Comparison
Rocha Birnen vs 6 Sultana Scones
Overall, Rocha Birnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rocha Birnen | 6 Sultana Scones |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 357 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rocha Birnen has 85% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 357 kcal).
- Rocha Birnen has 98% less fat (0.3 g vs 12 g).
- Rocha Birnen has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Rocha Birnen has 45% less sugar (12 g vs 22 g).
- Rocha Birnen has no salt, while 6 Sultana Scones has 1 g.
- 6 Sultana Scones has 29% more fiber (2.8 g vs 2 g).
- 6 Sultana Scones has 97% more protein (7.5 g vs 0.2 g).
Ingredients
Rocha Birnen
Ganze Birnen 100%.
6 Sultana Scones
Pears.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rocha Birnen or 6 Sultana Scones?
Overall, Rocha Birnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocha Birnen has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rocha Birnen has less sugar: 12 g versus 22 g per 100 g.