Roasted Gram vs Garbanzo de Fuentesauco
Overall, Roasted Gram has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Roasted Gram
Garbanzo de Fuentesauco
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roasted Gram | Garbanzo de Fuentesauco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 364 kcal | 122 kcal |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Ausencia |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has 67% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 364 kcal).
- Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has 62% less fat (2.7 g vs 7.1 g).
- Roasted Gram has no saturated fat, while Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has 0.3 g.
- Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has 93% less sugar (0.5 g vs 7.1 g).
- Roasted Gram has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Roasted Gram has 49% more fiber (10.7 g vs 5.5 g).
- Roasted Gram has 62% more protein (17.9 g vs 6.7 g).
- Only Garbanzo de Fuentesauco lists: Ausencia.
Ingredients
Roasted Gram
Gram (Channa, Chana, Garbanzo Beans, Chickpeas)
Garbanzo de Fuentesauco
100% garbanzo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roasted Gram or Garbanzo de Fuentesauco?
Overall, Roasted Gram has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.