Comparison

Roasted Gram vs Garbanzo de Fuentesauco

Overall, Roasted Gram has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRoasted GramGarbanzo de Fuentesauco
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 364 kcal 122 kcal
Fat 7.1 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 7.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 10.7 g 5.5 g
Protein 17.9 g 6.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedAusencia

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has 67% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 364 kcal).
  • Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has 62% less fat (2.7 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Roasted Gram has no saturated fat, while Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has 0.3 g.
  • Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has 93% less sugar (0.5 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Roasted Gram has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Roasted Gram has 49% more fiber (10.7 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Roasted Gram has 62% more protein (17.9 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Only Garbanzo de Fuentesauco lists: Ausencia.

Ingredients

Roasted Gram

Gram (Channa, Chana, Garbanzo Beans, Chickpeas)

Garbanzo de Fuentesauco

100% garbanzo

FAQ

Which is healthier: Roasted Gram or Garbanzo de Fuentesauco?

Overall, Roasted Gram has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Garbanzo de Fuentesauco has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons