Comparison
Riz Long Grain vs Il classico
Overall, Riz Long Grain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Long Grain | Il classico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz Long Grain has 27% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
- Riz Long Grain has no sugar, while Il classico has 0.4 g.
- Il classico has 34% more fiber (2 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Riz Long Grain
Riz long grain étuvé de qualité supérieure.
Il classico
RISO ROMA PARBOILED
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Long Grain or Il classico?
Overall, Riz Long Grain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Il classico has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz Long Grain has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.