Comparison

Riz long grain vs Ta Riz Med 800G C20

Overall, Riz long grain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Riz long grain	Ta Riz Med 800G C20
Nutri-Score	b	b
NOVA group	1	—
Calories	359 kcal	352 kcal
Fat	0.3 g	0.9 g
Saturated fat	0.1 g	0.2 g
Sugars	0.3 g	0.2 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	1.1 g	1.1 g
Protein	7.4 g	7.4 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Riz long grain has 67% less fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).

Ingredients

Riz long grain

100% long grain rice,

Ta Riz Med 800G C20

Riz blanc long grain

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz long grain or Ta Riz Med 800G C20?

Overall, Riz long grain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ta Riz Med 800G C20 has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ta Riz Med 800G C20 has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

LU RIZ 10' 5x90G V3 C14 vs Ta Riz Med 800G C20 Riz long grain vs LU RIZ 10' 5x90G V3 C14 Riz long grain incollabl... vs Ta Riz Med 800G C20 Riz long grain vs Riz long grain incollabl... Riz long grain vs Riz Thai Riz long grain vs IGP Riz de Camargue Riz long grain vs Riz Long Grain Riz Thai vs Ta Riz Med 800G C20