Comparison
Riz long grain vs Riz long grain incollable
Overall, Riz long grain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz long grain | Riz long grain incollable |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz long grain has 70% less fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Riz long grain
100% long grain rice,
Riz long grain incollable
Riz long grain étuvé.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz long grain or Riz long grain incollable?
Overall, Riz long grain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz long grain incollable has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz long grain has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
LU RIZ 10' 5x90G V3 C14 vs Riz long grain incollabl...
Riz long grain vs LU RIZ 10' 5x90G V3 C14
Riz long grain incollabl... vs Ta Riz Med 800G C20
Riz long grain incollabl... vs Riz Thai
IGP Riz de Camargue vs Riz long grain incollabl...
Riz Long Grain vs Riz long grain incollabl...
Riz long grain vs Riz Thai
Riz long grain vs IGP Riz de Camargue