Comparison

Riz long grain incollable vs Riz Thai

Overall, Riz long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz long grain incollableRiz Thai
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 353 kcal 353 kcal
Fat 1 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0.4 g 0.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.3 g 0.9 g
Protein 7.5 g 8.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riz long grain incollable has 31% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.9 g).

Ingredients

Riz long grain incollable

Riz long grain étuvé.

Riz Thai

Riz long

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz long grain incollable or Riz Thai?

Overall, Riz long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riz long grain incollable has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riz Thai has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons