Riz long grain incollable vs Riz Thai
Overall, Riz long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz long grain incollable | Riz Thai |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz long grain incollable has 31% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Riz long grain incollable
Riz long grain étuvé.
Riz Thai
Riz long
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz long grain incollable or Riz Thai?
Overall, Riz long grain incollable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz long grain incollable has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz Thai has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.