Comparison
Riz Thai vs Ta Riz Med 800G C20
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz Thai | Ta Riz Med 800G C20 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 8.1 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Riz Thai
Riz long
Ta Riz Med 800G C20
Riz blanc long grain
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz Thai or Ta Riz Med 800G C20?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ta Riz Med 800G C20 has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz Thai has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.