Riz gluant vs Sticky Rice
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz gluant | Sticky Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 152 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 4 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sticky Rice has 24% fewer calories (152 kcal vs 200 kcal).
- Riz gluant has no fat, while Sticky Rice has 1.8 g.
- Riz gluant has 43% more protein (4 g vs 2.3 g).
- Riz gluant is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Riz gluant
Riz
Sticky Rice
Steamed Short Grain Rice (97%), Sunflower Oil, Acidity Regulator: Glucono delta-lactone, Sugar, Salt. 5 016805 010385"> For cooking instructions & additional information PEEL
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz gluant or Sticky Rice?
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sticky Rice has fewer calories: 152 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz gluant has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.