Riz gluant vs Sticky Rice
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz gluant | Sticky Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 152 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sticky Rice has 57% fewer calories (152 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Riz gluant has 44% less fat (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Riz gluant has 64% more protein (6.4 g vs 2.3 g).
Ingredients
Riz gluant
Not available.
Sticky Rice
Steamed Short Grain Rice (97%), Sunflower Oil, Acidity Regulator: Glucono delta-lactone, Sugar, Salt. 5 016805 010385"> For cooking instructions & additional information PEEL
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz gluant or Sticky Rice?
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sticky Rice has fewer calories: 152 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz gluant has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.