Comparison
Riz gluant vs Riz gluant
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz gluant | Riz gluant |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 200 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.4 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz gluant has 44% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Riz gluant has no fat, while Riz gluant has 1 g.
- Riz gluant has 38% more protein (6.4 g vs 4 g).
Ingredients
Riz gluant
Not available.
Riz gluant
Riz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz gluant or Riz gluant?
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz gluant has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz gluant has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.