Comparison

Riz au lait nature vs Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC

Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz au lait natureRiz au lait entier 2x130g CC
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 117 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 2.8 g 6 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 3.9 g
Sugars 11 g 12 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.2 g 0.1 g
Protein 2.8 g 3.2 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riz au lait nature has 17% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 141 kcal).
  • Riz au lait nature has 53% less fat (2.8 g vs 6 g).
  • Riz au lait nature has 51% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC has 13% more protein (3.2 g vs 2.8 g).

Ingredients

Riz au lait nature

Lait entier 65%, eau, riz 10%, sucre 9%, amidon de riz, crème, poudre de lait écrémé, sel. Traces de gluten.

Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC

Lait entier de vache* 83,6% (France), riz de Camargue IGP rond blanc* 8,6% (France), sucre de canne blond* *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz au lait nature or Riz au lait entier 2x130g CC?

Overall, Riz au lait nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riz au lait nature has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riz au lait nature has less sugar: 11 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons