Comparison

Risotto con carciofi vs Riso rosso integrale

Overall, Riso rosso integrale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRisotto con carciofiRiso rosso integrale
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — —
Calories 363 kcal 344 kcal
Fat 1.4 g 2.9 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.8 g
Sugars 1.2 g 1.1 g
Salt 2.7 g 0 g
Fiber 1.2 g 3.8 g
Protein 6.1 g 7.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Risotto con carciofi has 52% less fat (1.4 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Risotto con carciofi has 50% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Riso rosso integrale has no salt, while Risotto con carciofi has 2.7 g.
  • Riso rosso integrale has 68% more fiber (3.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Riso rosso integrale has 20% more protein (7.6 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Riso rosso integrale has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Risotto con carciofi

Not available.

Riso rosso integrale

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Risotto con carciofi or Riso rosso integrale?

Overall, Riso rosso integrale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riso rosso integrale has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riso rosso integrale has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons