Comparison
Riso roma vs Riso Roma integrale
Overall, Riso roma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riso roma | Riso Roma integrale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riso roma has 74% less fat (0.7 g vs 2.7 g).
- Riso roma has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Riso roma has no sugar, while Riso Roma integrale has 1 g.
- Riso Roma integrale has 77% more fiber (4.3 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Riso roma
Not available.
Riso Roma integrale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riso roma or Riso Roma integrale?
Overall, Riso roma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riso Roma integrale has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riso roma has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.