Comparison
Riso Roma vs Riso Roma integrale
Overall, Riso Roma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riso Roma | Riso Roma integrale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riso Roma has 85% less fat (0.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Riso Roma has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Riso Roma has 80% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Riso Roma integrale has 77% more fiber (4.3 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Riso Roma
Not available.
Riso Roma integrale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riso Roma or Riso Roma integrale?
Overall, Riso Roma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riso Roma integrale has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riso Roma has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1 g per 100 g.