Comparison

Rislunsj vs Min Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåbær 90g Nestle

Overall, Min Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåbær 90g Nestle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRislunsjMin Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåb...
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 139 kcal 56 kcal
Fat 5.1 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 3.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 12 g 12 g
Salt — 0 g
Fiber — 1.5 g
Protein 2.9 g 0.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Min Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåbær 90g Nestle has 60% fewer calories (56 kcal vs 139 kcal).
  • Min Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåbær 90g Nestle has 96% less fat (0.2 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Min Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåbær 90g Nestle has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Rislunsj has 90% more protein (2.9 g vs 0.3 g).

Ingredients

Rislunsj

Rispudding (83%): helmelk, 13 % ris, kremfløte, proteinredusert skummetmelk, sukker*, emulgator (melkesyreestere av mono - og diglyserider av fettsyrer), stabilisator (pektiner, gellan-gummi), salt, aroma. bærsaus (17%): sukker*, 27% bringebær, vann, 18% blåbær, stabilisator (pektiner, johannesbrødkjernemel), surhetsregulerende middel (sitronsyre), aromaer, konserveringsmiddel (kaliumsorbat))

Min Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåbær 90g Nestle

Eple-/æble-/äpplepuré (86%), blåbær-/blåbärpuré (9%), bananpuré (5%), vitamin c.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rislunsj or Min Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåbær 90g Nestle?

Overall, Min Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåbær 90g Nestle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Min Frukt Smoothie Eple&Blåbær 90g Nestle has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rislunsj has less sugar: 12 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons