Rindshacksteak vs Steak haché
Overall, Steak haché has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindshacksteak | Steak haché |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 108 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 2 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak haché has 53% fewer calories (108 kcal vs 230 kcal).
- Steak haché has 95% less fat (0.8 g vs 17 g).
- Steak haché has 96% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 6.8 g).
- Steak haché has 92% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Steak haché has 44% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Steak haché has 22% more protein (23 g vs 18 g).
- Steak haché has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rindshacksteak
Viande de boeuf, sel de cuisine, mélange d'épices, huile de colza, fécule de pomme de terre, sirop de gluçose, sucre, extrait de levure, extrait de thé vert, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium, colorant: extrait de paprika, arômes
Steak haché
STEAK HACHE Ingredients Préparation de viande de boeuf: Viande de boeuf 89%, eau, fibre de bambou, sel, stabilisants (E262(i) E331(iii), antioxydants (E301 - E300).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindshacksteak or Steak haché?
Overall, Steak haché has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak haché has fewer calories: 108 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steak haché has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.