Rindshacksteak vs Wagyu Burgers
Overall, Rindshacksteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindshacksteak | Wagyu Burgers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 277 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 8.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rindshacksteak has 17% fewer calories (230 kcal vs 277 kcal).
- Rindshacksteak has 23% less fat (17 g vs 22 g).
- Rindshacksteak has 18% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 8.3 g).
- Rindshacksteak has 63% less sugar (1.2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Wagyu Burgers has 56% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rindshacksteak has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Rindshacksteak
Viande de boeuf, sel de cuisine, mélange d'épices, huile de colza, fécule de pomme de terre, sirop de gluçose, sucre, extrait de levure, extrait de thé vert, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium, colorant: extrait de paprika, arômes
Wagyu Burgers
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindshacksteak or Wagyu Burgers?
Overall, Rindshacksteak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindshacksteak has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 277 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindshacksteak has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.