Rindshacksteak vs Croc' crème & champignons
Overall, Croc' crème & champignons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Rindshacksteak
Croc' crème & champignons
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindshacksteak | Croc' crème & champignons |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 232 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 2 | 8 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Croc' crème & champignons has 18% less fat (14 g vs 17 g).
- Croc' crème & champignons has 41% less saturated fat (4 g vs 6.8 g).
- Croc' crème & champignons has 25% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rindshacksteak has 39% more protein (18 g vs 11 g).
- Croc' crème & champignons has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Croc' crème & champignons lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Rindshacksteak
Viande de boeuf, sel de cuisine, mélange d'épices, huile de colza, fécule de pomme de terre, sirop de gluçose, sucre, extrait de levure, extrait de thé vert, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium, colorant: extrait de paprika, arômes
Croc' crème & champignons
Viande de porc (41% minimum), eau, chapelure (14.1%) (farine de blé, levure, sel), huiles végétales, crème (4.9%), farines (blé, mais, pois chiches), champignons de paris (2.3%), fibres végétales, amidon modifie, amidon de blé, arômes, gélatine de boeuf, sel, épaississants : E461, E415, E407, E508, oignons déshydratés, stabilisant : E451, protéines végétales de pois, antioxydant : E392, extrait d'épice.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindshacksteak or Croc' crème & champignons?
Overall, Croc' crème & champignons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindshacksteak has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 232 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindshacksteak has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.