Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer vs Putenbrust
Overall, Putenbrust has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindersaftschinken mit Steak... | Putenbrust |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 98 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Putenbrust has 40% less fat (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Putenbrust has 56% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer
Rindfleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte, 0,5 % Pfeffer schwarz, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Putenbrust
82% Putenbrustfilet, 14% Geflügelbouillon (Wasser, Putenhaut, Putenfleisch, Salz, Maisstärke, Zucker, Zwiebelsaftkonzentrat, Karottensaftkonzentrat), Salz, Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte, Konservierungsstoffe: Natriumacetate und Natriumnitrit, Stabilisator: Triphosphate, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer or Putenbrust?
Overall, Putenbrust has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Putenbrust has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 98 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.