Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer vs Veganer Schinken Spicker Bunte Paprika
Overall, Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer
Veganer Schinken Spicker Bunte Paprika
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindersaftschinken mit Steak... | Veganer Schinken Spicker Bun... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 98 kcal | 114 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 6.8 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has 14% fewer calories (98 kcal vs 114 kcal).
- Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has 77% less fat (2 g vs 8.6 g).
- Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has 50% less sugar (1 g vs 2 g).
- Veganer Schinken Spicker Bunte Paprika has 100% more fiber (6.8 g vs 0 g).
- Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has 88% more protein (19 g vs 2.2 g).
- Veganer Schinken Spicker Bunte Paprika has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer
Rindfleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte, 0,5 % Pfeffer schwarz, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Veganer Schinken Spicker Bunte Paprika
Trinkwasser, Rapsöl, 6% Paprika, Bambusfasern, Gewürzextrakte, 2% Sonnenblumenprotein, Kochsalz, Traubenzucker, natürliches Aroma, Citrusfasern, Verdickungsmittel (Carrageen, Tarakernmehl, Konjak), Gewürze, Kartoffelprotein, Farbstoffe (Anthocyane, Carotine).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer or Veganer Schinken Spicker Bunte Paprika?
Overall, Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindersaftschinken mit Steakpfeffer has less sugar: 1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.