Comparison

Rillettes Fines de Bretagne vs Geflügelleber-Pâté mit Schweinefleisch, Entenfleisch und Weißwein

Overall, Rillettes Fines de Bretagne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRillettes Fines de BretagneGeflügelleber-Pâté mit Schwe...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 394 kcal 282 kcal
Fat 36.4 g 24 g
Saturated fat 13.8 g 8.5 g
Sugars 0.1 g 1 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.8 g
Fiber 3.2 g —
Protein 16.5 g 15.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Geflügelleber-Pâté mit Schweinefleisch, Entenfleisch und Weißwein has 28% fewer calories (282 kcal vs 394 kcal).
  • Geflügelleber-Pâté mit Schweinefleisch, Entenfleisch und Weißwein has 34% less fat (24 g vs 36.4 g).
  • Geflügelleber-Pâté mit Schweinefleisch, Entenfleisch und Weißwein has 38% less saturated fat (8.5 g vs 13.8 g).
  • Rillettes Fines de Bretagne has 90% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Rillettes Fines de Bretagne has 33% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Rillettes Fines de Bretagne has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Rillettes Fines de Bretagne

Viande de porc*, gras de porc* (113g de porc pour 100g), sel, poivre. * Origine France.

Geflügelleber-Pâté mit Schweinefleisch, Entenfleisch und Weißwein

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rillettes Fines de Bretagne or Geflügelleber-Pâté mit Schweinefleisch, Entenfleisch und Weißwein?

Overall, Rillettes Fines de Bretagne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Geflügelleber-Pâté mit Schweinefleisch, Entenfleisch und Weißwein has fewer calories: 282 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rillettes Fines de Bretagne has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons