Comparison

Rillettes crabe vs Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP

Overall, Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRillettes crabeRillettes de langoustine à l...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 209 kcal 177 kcal
Fat 17 g 13 g
Saturated fat 11 g 8.4 g
Sugars 2.2 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.4 g 1.4 g
Fiber — 0.6 g
Protein 10 g 11 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedCrustaceans, Fish, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP has 15% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 209 kcal).
  • Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP has 24% less fat (13 g vs 17 g).
  • Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP has 24% less saturated fat (8.4 g vs 11 g).
  • Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP has 32% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Only Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP lists: Crustaceans, Fish, Milk.

Ingredients

Rillettes crabe

Not available.

Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP

Langoustine 38,6%, crème fraîche, poisson blanc, Oignon de Roscoff AOP (8,7%), beurre, jus de citron, carotte, pomme de terre, sel, épaississant : agar-agar, ail, poivre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rillettes crabe or Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP?

Overall, Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rillettes de langoustine à l'oignon de Roscoff AOP has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons