Comparison
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli | Ricciarelli di Siena IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 478 kcal | 459 kcal |
| Fat | 25.8 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 45.4 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | — |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has 14% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Ricciarelli has 11% more protein (12.4 g vs 11 g).
- Ricciarelli has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli
Not available.
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli or Ricciarelli di Siena IGP?
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has fewer calories: 459 kcal versus 478 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli has less sugar: 45.4 g versus 49 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli Pistacchio
Ricciarelli Pistacchio vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli Mandorla
Ricciarelli Mandorla vs Ricciarelli di Siena IGP