Ribeye Steak vs Iris thin cut beef steaks
Overall, Iris thin cut beef steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ribeye Steak | Iris thin cut beef steaks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 150 kcal |
| Fat | 21.7 g | 7.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | — | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25.2 g | 21.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Iris thin cut beef steaks has 40% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 249 kcal).
- Iris thin cut beef steaks has 67% less fat (7.2 g vs 21.7 g).
- Iris thin cut beef steaks has 72% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 11 g).
- Iris thin cut beef steaks has no sugar, while Ribeye Steak has 0.5 g.
- Ribeye Steak has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Ribeye Steak has 16% more protein (25.2 g vs 21.2 g).
Ingredients
Ribeye Steak
Not available.
Iris thin cut beef steaks
Thin cut beef steaks
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ribeye Steak or Iris thin cut beef steaks?
Overall, Iris thin cut beef steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Iris thin cut beef steaks has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Iris thin cut beef steaks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.