Comparison

Ribeye Steak vs Iris thin cut beef steaks

Overall, Iris thin cut beef steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRibeye SteakIris thin cut beef steaks
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group — —
Calories 249 kcal 150 kcal
Fat 21.7 g 7.2 g
Saturated fat 11 g 3.1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt — 0.3 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 25.2 g 21.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Iris thin cut beef steaks has 40% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 249 kcal).
  • Iris thin cut beef steaks has 67% less fat (7.2 g vs 21.7 g).
  • Iris thin cut beef steaks has 72% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 11 g).
  • Iris thin cut beef steaks has no sugar, while Ribeye Steak has 0.5 g.
  • Ribeye Steak has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Ribeye Steak has 16% more protein (25.2 g vs 21.2 g).

Ingredients

Ribeye Steak

Not available.

Iris thin cut beef steaks

Thin cut beef steaks

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ribeye Steak or Iris thin cut beef steaks?

Overall, Iris thin cut beef steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Iris thin cut beef steaks has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Iris thin cut beef steaks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons