Steak de Bœuf à Griller vs Iris thin cut beef steaks
Overall, Steak de Bœuf à Griller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Steak de Bœuf à Griller
Iris thin cut beef steaks
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Steak de Bœuf à Griller | Iris thin cut beef steaks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 113 kcal | 150 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 7.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 21.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak de Bœuf à Griller has 25% fewer calories (113 kcal vs 150 kcal).
- Steak de Bœuf à Griller has 68% less fat (2.3 g vs 7.2 g).
- Steak de Bœuf à Griller has 74% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 3.1 g).
- Steak de Bœuf à Griller has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Steak de Bœuf à Griller
100% viande de boeuf
Iris thin cut beef steaks
Thin cut beef steaks
FAQ
Which is healthier: Steak de Bœuf à Griller or Iris thin cut beef steaks?
Overall, Steak de Bœuf à Griller has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak de Bœuf à Griller has fewer calories: 113 kcal versus 150 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steak de Bœuf à Griller has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.