Comparison

REWE Bio Hafer Cookies 4337256447584 Knusprige Cookies mit Bio Haferflocken vs Hobnobs

Overall, REWE Bio Hafer Cookies 4337256447584 Knusprige Cookies mit Bio Haferflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientREWE Bio Hafer Cookies 43372...Hobnobs
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 473 kcal 472 kcal
Fat 19.9 g 20.2 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 8.8 g
Sugars 25 g 22.9 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.8 g
Fiber 6.2 g 6.5 g
Protein 8.4 g 7.4 g
Additives14
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • REWE Bio Hafer Cookies 4337256447584 Knusprige Cookies mit Bio Haferflocken has 78% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 8.8 g).
  • REWE Bio Hafer Cookies 4337256447584 Knusprige Cookies mit Bio Haferflocken has 12% more protein (8.4 g vs 7.4 g).
  • REWE Bio Hafer Cookies 4337256447584 Knusprige Cookies mit Bio Haferflocken has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

REWE Bio Hafer Cookies 4337256447584 Knusprige Cookies mit Bio Haferflocken

42,6 % Haferflocken, Zucker, 21,2 % Weizenvollkornmehl, Sonnenblumenöl, Invertzuckersirup, Backtriebmittel (Natriumcarbonate), Speisesalz.

Hobnobs

Wholegrain Rolled Oats (39%), Wholemeal Wheat Flour (23%), Palm Oil, Sugar, Partially Inverted Sugar Syrup, Raising Agents (Sodium Bicarbonate, Ammonium Bicarbonate), Salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: REWE Bio Hafer Cookies 4337256447584 Knusprige Cookies mit Bio Haferflocken or Hobnobs?

Overall, REWE Bio Hafer Cookies 4337256447584 Knusprige Cookies mit Bio Haferflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hobnobs has fewer calories: 472 kcal versus 473 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hobnobs has less sugar: 22.9 g versus 25 g per 100 g.

More comparisons