Reisflocken vs Copos de arroz y trigo integral con chocolate
Overall, Reisflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Reisflocken | Copos de arroz y trigo integ... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 393 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 5.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 3.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 27.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | — |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Reisflocken has 10% fewer calories (352 kcal vs 393 kcal).
- Reisflocken has 63% less fat (2.2 g vs 5.9 g).
- Reisflocken has 82% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 3.4 g).
- Reisflocken has 97% less sugar (0.7 g vs 27.9 g).
- Reisflocken has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1.3 g).
- Reisflocken has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Reisflocken
Reisvollkornflocken
Copos de arroz y trigo integral con chocolate
Es: arroz (28%), Trigo integral (28%), Azúcar (1500), Cobertura de chocolate con leche (159%) (azúca, manteca de cacaa, leche vitaminasy minerales porn 100 rn 30g rn chocolate con leche, con 8 vitaminas (vit e, b1, b2, b3, b6, b9, b12, b5) y hierro
FAQ
Which is healthier: Reisflocken or Copos de arroz y trigo integral con chocolate?
Overall, Reisflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Reisflocken has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Reisflocken has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 27.9 g per 100 g.