Reisflocken vs Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada
Overall, Reisflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Reisflocken | Copos de arroz, trigo integr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 385 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 15 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | — |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 8.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada has 27% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada has 50% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Reisflocken has 95% less sugar (0.7 g vs 15 g).
- Reisflocken has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Reisflocken has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Reisflocken
Reisvollkornflocken
Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada
Cereales (91%) [arroz, trigo integral (gluten), cebada (gluten)], azúcar, harina integral de trigo (gluten), sal, harina de cebada malteada (gluten), vitaminas: C, niacina (PP), B6, riboflavina (B2), tiamina (B1), ácido fólico (B9), B12, hierro, emulgente: mono - y diglicéridos de ácidos grasos, Contiene gluten,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Reisflocken or Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada?
Overall, Reisflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Reisflocken has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Reisflocken has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 15 g per 100 g.