Comparison

Flocons de riz vs Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada

Overall, Flocons de riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFlocons de rizCopos de arroz, trigo integr...
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 351 kcal 385 kcal
Fat 2.4 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1.2 g 15 g
Salt 0 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.5 g —
Protein 8.5 g 8.3 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada has 33% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Flocons de riz has 92% less sugar (1.2 g vs 15 g).
  • Flocons de riz has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Flocons de riz has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Flocons de riz

flocons de riz

Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada

Cereales (91%) [arroz, trigo integral (gluten), cebada (gluten)], azúcar, harina integral de trigo (gluten), sal, harina de cebada malteada (gluten), vitaminas: C, niacina (PP), B6, riboflavina (B2), tiamina (B1), ácido fólico (B9), B12, hierro, emulgente: mono - y diglicéridos de ácidos grasos, Contiene gluten,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flocons de riz or Copos de arroz, trigo integral y cebada?

Overall, Flocons de riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flocons de riz has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Flocons de riz has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons