Comparison

Regenbogenforellen Filets vs Lachsforelle

Overall, Regenbogenforellen Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRegenbogenforellen FiletsLachsforelle
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group — —
Calories 122 kcal 148 kcal
Fat 5 g 8 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1.4 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 2.3 g
Protein 19 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Regenbogenforellen Filets has 18% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 148 kcal).
  • Regenbogenforellen Filets has 38% less fat (5 g vs 8 g).
  • Regenbogenforellen Filets has 29% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Regenbogenforellen Filets has 90% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Regenbogenforellen Filets has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Regenbogenforellen Filets

Not available.

Lachsforelle

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Regenbogenforellen Filets or Lachsforelle?

Overall, Regenbogenforellen Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Regenbogenforellen Filets has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 148 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Regenbogenforellen Filets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons