Comparison

Red seedless grapes vs Raisins secs sultanines

Overall, Red seedless grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRed seedless grapesRaisins secs sultanines
Nutri-Score a —
NOVA group — 3
Calories 73 kcal 321 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 15.5 g 70 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1 g 4.2 g
Protein 0.8 g 3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Red seedless grapes has 77% fewer calories (73 kcal vs 321 kcal).
  • Red seedless grapes has 44% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Red seedless grapes has 97% less saturated fat (0 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Red seedless grapes has 78% less sugar (15.5 g vs 70 g).
  • Raisins secs sultanines has 76% more fiber (4.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Raisins secs sultanines has 75% more protein (3 g vs 0.8 g).

Ingredients

Red seedless grapes

Not available.

Raisins secs sultanines

Raisins biologiques* 99,5%, huile de tournesol* biologique 0,5%* *ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique 100% (origine Turquie)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Red seedless grapes or Raisins secs sultanines?

Overall, Red seedless grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Red seedless grapes has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Red seedless grapes has less sugar: 15.5 g versus 70 g per 100 g.

More comparisons