Comparison

Red quinoa tortilla chips vs Quinoa chips

Overall, Quinoa chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRed quinoa tortilla chipsQuinoa chips
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 464 kcal 450 kcal
Fat 28.6 g 17 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 1.6 g
Sugars 3.6 g 3.1 g
Salt 1.8 g 2.3 g
Fiber 3.6 g 3 g
Protein 3.6 g 8.5 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Quinoa chips has 40% less fat (17 g vs 28.6 g).
  • Quinoa chips has 55% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Quinoa chips has 13% less sugar (3.1 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Red quinoa tortilla chips has 20% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Red quinoa tortilla chips has 16% more fiber (3.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Quinoa chips has 58% more protein (8.5 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Red quinoa tortilla chips is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Red quinoa tortilla chips

Cassava flour, non-GMO yellow corn flour, avocado oil, red quinoa multigrain blend (brown rice flour, red quinoa, brown flaxseeds, raw cane sugar, chia seeds, sea salt, white quinoa), salt.

Quinoa chips

Quinoa Flour (21%), Maize Flour, Rapeseed Oil, Rice Flour, Sour Cream & Chive Flavour Seasoning [Rice Flour, Onion Powder, Yeast Extract Powder, Salt, Natural Flavouring, Garlic Powder, Sugar, Chives, Acid (Citric Acid)], Maize Starch, Lentil Flour, Pea Flour, Sugar, Salt. Packaged in a protective atmosphere.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Red quinoa tortilla chips or Quinoa chips?

Overall, Quinoa chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Quinoa chips has fewer calories: 450 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Quinoa chips has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons