Comparison
Red Beans vs Fasola piękny jaś
Overall, Red Beans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Red Beans | Fasola piękny jaś |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 229 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 31.4 g | 21 g |
| Protein | 22.9 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Beans has 24% fewer calories (229 kcal vs 300 kcal).
- Red Beans has 51% less fat (1.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Red Beans has no saturated fat, while Fasola piękny jaś has 0.5 g.
- Red Beans has 46% less sugar (2.9 g vs 5.3 g).
- Red Beans has 33% more fiber (31.4 g vs 21 g).
- Red Beans has 13% more protein (22.9 g vs 20 g).
- Only Fasola piękny jaś lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Red Beans
SMALL RED BEANS.
Fasola piękny jaś
Fasola piękny Jaś karłowy. Produkt może zawierać zboża zawierające gluten (pszenicę, jęczmień, owies, żyto, orkisz).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red Beans or Fasola piękny jaś?
Overall, Red Beans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Red Beans has fewer calories: 229 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Beans has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.