Real Dairy Squirty Cream vs Nata para cocinar
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Real Dairy Squirty Cream | Nata para cocinar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 301 kcal | 187 kcal |
| Fat | 27.5 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 19.5 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 10.9 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata para cocinar has 38% fewer calories (187 kcal vs 301 kcal).
- Nata para cocinar has 35% less fat (18 g vs 27.5 g).
- Nata para cocinar has 33% less saturated fat (13 g vs 19.5 g).
- Nata para cocinar has 67% less sugar (3.6 g vs 10.9 g).
- Nata para cocinar has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Real Dairy Squirty Cream
cream, sugar, emulsifiers, mono and diglyceridies of fatty acids, stabilisers, carrageenan, natural flavouring, propellant gas, nitrous oxide
Nata para cocinar
nata (_leche_), almidón modificado de maíz, emulgente (E471), estabilizantes (E407, E466), corrector de acidez (E331).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Real Dairy Squirty Cream or Nata para cocinar?
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata para cocinar has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata para cocinar has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 10.9 g per 100 g.