Crème de Normandie vs Nata para cocinar
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Crème de Normandie | Nata para cocinar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 294 kcal | 187 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 20.1 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata para cocinar has 36% fewer calories (187 kcal vs 294 kcal).
- Nata para cocinar has 40% less fat (18 g vs 30 g).
- Nata para cocinar has 35% less saturated fat (13 g vs 20.1 g).
Ingredients
Crème de Normandie
Crème de lait*, stabilisant: pectine. *Issue de l'agriculture Biologique et du commerce équitable
Nata para cocinar
nata (_leche_), almidón modificado de maíz, emulgente (E471), estabilizantes (E407, E466), corrector de acidez (E331).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème de Normandie or Nata para cocinar?
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata para cocinar has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 294 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crème de Normandie has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.